Dell must defend suit alleging defective notebooks
From Reuters US Online Report Technology News | 2010-02-05 18:37:44
<div><p>NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal appeals court reinstated on Friday a proposed class-action lawsuit accusing Dell Inc of selling defective notebook computers.</p><p>A panel of the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco reversed a federal district court's 2008 dismissal of the case against the third-largest personal computer maker.</p><p>That dismissal followed the plaintiffs' refusal to comply with a district court order that their claims be arbitrated.</p><p>Dell, based in Round Rock, Texas, did not immediately return a request for comment.</p><p>In their lawsuit, the plaintiffs alleged that Dell violated California consumer laws by selling Inspiron notebooks that had inadequate cooling systems, power supplies and motherboards.</p><p>They said the defects caused their notebooks to shut down without warning, fail to boot up, or deteriorate too quickly.</p><p>The notebooks were bought between July 2004 and January 2005. It is not clear how many customers were affected.</p><p>In Friday's ruling, Judge Lyle Strom said the district court abused its discretion in dismissing the case and "the public's interest in a resolution on the merits weighed strongly" in favor of letting the case continue.</p><p>The judge also called it "unconscionable" to enforce a provision in customers' sales contracts requiring arbitration, in part because customers may decide not to pursue claims over the $1,200 to $1,500 computers individually.</p><p>"Dell has fought very, very hard," said Jonathan Selbin, a New York-based partner at Lieff Cabraser Heimann &amp; Bernstein LLP representing the plaintiffs. "We got the courtroom doors open, which was our primary goal."</p><p>The appeals court sent the case back to the district court for further proceedings. Strom is a senior district court judge in Nebraska, who was sitting in California by designation.</p><p>Shares of Dell were down 2 cents at $12.99 in afternoon trading on the Nasdaq.</p><p>The case is Omstead et al v. Dell Inc, U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, No., 08-16479.</p><p>(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel; Additional reporting by Gabriel Madway in San Francisco; editing by Gerald E. McCormick)</p><img src="http://admatch-syndication.mochila.com/images/ad.gif?aid=68521916&bid=informcom" /></div><div id="copyright"><div>
Copyright 2010 <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance">Reuters US Online Report Technology News</a></div></div>
Related Video by 5min
Related Articles
- Patrick on biz health costs: 'We get it' Business First - Louisville | 2010-03-15 14:12:48
- Contraceptive-coverage bill passes Colorado Senate Business First - Louisville | 2010-03-15 14:12:48
- PRC issues health insurance warning Business First - Louisville | 2010-03-15 14:12:49
- Health Care 101: A consumer primer on Obama's bill Boston Globe | 2010-03-15 06:24:43
- Rattlesnake Attack is Pet Insurer's Most Unusual January Claim Canadian Business Online | 2010-03-15 11:38:26
- Health plan profits rise, but remain less than 5 percent: Double-digit premium increases track fast-rising medical costs Business First - Louisville | 2010-03-15 14:09:30
Related Blogs
- Are Health Insurers Worth Bashing? Baseline Scenario | 2010-03-15 13:10:57
- Understanding wage stagnation The Economist: Free Exchange | 2010-03-15 14:44:41
- Markets Know No Borders - Freedom Must Stretch Across All Humanity The Distributed Republic | 2010-03-15 18:19:16
- Health Care and Abortion -- By: Ramesh Ponnuru The Corner | 2010-03-15 14:44:15
- Myths and Falsehoods on budget reconciliation Media Matters for America | 2010-03-15 17:01:46
Related Video
- Crain's Headlines: Chicago Jobs; Big Bonuses CBS2 WBBM Top Stories Video | 2010-03-15 08:18:01
- Health insurance monopoly CNN Video | 2010-03-12 09:03:00