Cuts proposal could help — or hinder — Gibbons

<div id="subtitle">overnorÕs plan: State funding for class-size reduction and all-day kindergarten would be eliminated, along with collective bargaining rights. LegislatureÕs response: Republican leaders said they were not briefed. Democrats denounced the proposals, saying theyÕre motivated by politics. WhatÕs next: The proposals are unlikely to pass in a special session, but the debate will likely help the governor leading up to a three-way GOP primary. THE POLITICS: Conservative base will be keen on the proposed savings</div><div><p> Democrats and Republicans agreed that the chances of success for many of the ambitious education proposals floated Wednesday by Gov. Jim Gibbons range from slim all the way to none. But that wasnt necessarily the point.</p><p>Gibbons plan which reads like the wish list of a conservative education reformer appears aimed at exciting the conservative Republican base, while offering a way to cut the state budget.</p><p>It certainly has put his political opponents on the defensive.</p><p>The governors proposal, which he presented to legislators Wednesday in Las Vegas, would eliminate funding for class-size reduction and all-day kindergarten. Some of that money, although not all, would be returned to school districts, his staff said. The proposal would also add a statewide voucher program, which parents could use to pay for private schools.</p><p>Gibbons proposed eliminating collective bargaining rights for teachers and other local government employees, such as cops and firefighters.</p><p>The plan hits several favored conservative targets the teachers union, state bureaucracy and its mandates and emphasizes local school board control.</p><p>Gibbons is taking onK-12 education, particularly the union, which is very popular with the Republican base, said Eric Herzik, a UNR political science professor.</p><p>He added: I cant believe he expects this to pass. He knows that the Assembly, in particular, will dig in its heels and say no.</p><p>But in a meeting with legislators, which was closed to the</p><p> media, he said he would call as many special sessions as necessary to get this passed, according to Assemblywoman Debbie Smith, D-Reno. He was pretty riled up.</p><p>Smiths account was confirmed by another participant.</p><p>Besides not agreeing with his proposals, Smith wondered about the wisdom of enacting such change in a special session, where the Legislature usually meets for only a day or two.</p><p>After the meeting, Gibbons sounded conciliatory. Were coming up with our proposals, our ideas. They are not the complete answer. Some of them may be totally unacceptable to legislators, but at least were coming up with ideas ... Were asking them to bring their ideas, their suggestions to the table for review.</p><p>Gibbons said his proposals would cut from $30 million to $100 million from the education budget.</p><p>Gibbons reached out to a handful of school superintendents before Wednesdays meeting, according to his staff.</p><p>He did not apparently reach out to the Republican legislative leaders who would be needed if the proposals are to have any hope of becoming law during a special session. Senior Republican Sens. Bill Raggio and Randolph Townsend, and Assembly Minority Leader Heidi Gansert said they had not been briefed.</p><p>This would be a difficult agenda to push through a Legislature controlled by Democrats, Raggio said.</p><p>He dismissed the idea that the state could do away with collective bargaining altogether, and pointed out Gibbons history as sponsoring the Education First initiative. This is a departure from that.</p><p>Not surprisingly, Democrats were critical of the proposals and accused the governor of playing politics.</p><p>Hes trying to shore up his dismal approval rating with his base, Assembly Majority Leader John Oceguera said. These cuts will do more to hurt the economy than help in the long run. It hurts schools, hurts students and ... hurts our economy.</p><p>Some ideas are untenable, particularly in a special session, he said. For example, some recently built classrooms are smaller to accommodate lower student-to-teacher ratios, and cant fit more kids.</p><p>Clark County Commission Chairman Rory Reid, a Democrat running for governor against Gibbons, said, If the governor really cared about education, he wouldve talked about it during the two sessions when he was supposedly leader of the state. Its unfortunate that he waits until his back is against the wall and his own political future is at stake to put out an education plan.</p><p>Sen. Joyce Woodhouse, chairwoman of the interim committee on education, said legislators in Wednesdays meeting were surprised by Gibbons proposals.</p><p>Im surprised at how far-reaching they are, she said. Many of these issues have been hard fought and won over the years. Weve always believed they were good for the education of our children.</p><p>But Oceguera, Reid and Woodhouse wont be voting in Junes gubernatorial primary.</p><p>In that race, Gibbons most formidable opponent will be Brian Sandoval, the charismatic former judge who is ahead of Gibbons in polls and is expected to have far more money to run a campaign.</p><p>Gibbons proposal almost obligates Sandoval to take a position.</p><p>Sandoval is walking a tight line, trying to show his conservative bona fides to beat Gibbons and former North Las Vegas Mayor Mike Montandon in the Republican primary while keeping an eye on the general election when he will need to appeal to moderates.</p><p>Sandoval last week told the Las Vegas Sun that Gibbons budget approach was prudent. He was unavailable for comment Wednesday, according to his campaign. Instead, in a statement released by his campaign, Sandoval said, While Im an advocate of school choice, expanding empowerment schools and increased parental involvement, I believe it is an extremely bad idea to be laying off hundreds of teachers in a time of record unemployment in Nevada.</p><p>But others had nothing but praise for Gibbons plan. The conservative Nevada Policy Research Institute called it a win-win for Nevada and a day of hope for Nevadas children thanks to the governors proposed education reform.</p><p>Conservative consultant Chuck Muth wrote in his analysis of Gibbons proposal: This is exactly the sort of thing which might, just might, put Gov. Jim Gibbons back in the running for the Republican nomination and re-election next fall.</p><p>Indeed, Wednesdays announcement, with its talk of dismantling the elected State Board of Education and crushing unions is a reminder of a touchstone moment in the conservative movement, during the Ronald Reagan era.</p><p>Reagan ran for president in 1980, promising to abolish the U.S. Education Department. Conservatives still look back fondly on the ire of labor supporters after Reagan fired air traffic controllers when they went on strike in 1981.</p><p>The push to end collective bargaining for public employees, which would essentially crush the unions, echoes Reagans dramatic move, which is widely viewed as the beginning of a sharply anti-labor turn in American governance.</p><p>Still, Gibbons has to watch out for a backlash.</p><p>Alison Turner, president of the Nevada Parent Teacher Association, said full-day kindergarten and class-size reductions were proven strategies to improve education.</p><p>It will be crippling to the state, taxpayers and kids, Turner said. Businesses moving here require a first-class education system.</p><p>Indeed, Gibbons might be taking on relatively popular punching bags, like the union and state bureaucracy.</p><p>If it hits citizens in a personal, tangible way your childs class size gets bigger and the respected teacher you know gets laid off anger will mount. And teachers are still considered a popular group.</p><p>If the rank-and-file teachers get riled up, if they can separate themselves from being the union, Gibbons has picked a fight with a large and powerful group, Herzik said.</p><p>Sun reporters Cy Ryan and J. Patrick Coolican contributed to this story.</p><p>David McGrath Schwartz can be reached at 775-687-4597 or at david.schwartz@lasvegassun.com. Michael J. Mishak can be reached at 259-2347 or at michael.mishak@lasvegassun.com.</p><img src="http://admatch-syndication.mochila.com/images/ad.gif?aid=66537875&bid=informcom" /></div><div id="copyright"><div>


Copyright 2010  <a href="http://lasvegassun.com">Las Vegas Sun</a></div></div>


Related Video by 5min

loading

Related Articles

Related Blogs

Related Video